Start with the questions your team needs to answer
Choose the audience closest to your work. Each page connects challenges with relevant product topics, an illustrative review workflow, potential benefits to validate, and questions to bring to a demo.
Crypto Exchanges and VASPs
Frame your exchange or VASP evaluation around address review, transaction oversight, and the handover from an alert to a decision.
Primary review question“Which counterparties and addresses need review before a transaction proceeds?”
Illustrative workflow examples- Address and wallet review
- Transaction oversight
- Alert-to-decision handover
Related FinTrace productsExplore solutionBanks and Financial Institutions
Explore how blockchain information could fit a defined review process, with explicit questions about evidence, ownership, and governance.
Primary review question“How would blockchain evidence fit our existing governance and review process?”
Illustrative workflow examples- Structured evidence review
- Ownership questions
- Governance alignment
Related FinTrace productsExplore solutionPayment Providers
Define where a blockchain review would fit your payment process and what your team would need to act on the information.
Primary review question“At which point in our payment flow should a blockchain check occur?”
Illustrative workflow examples- Payment-flow checkpoints
- Risk context at settlement
- Action on flagged payments
Related FinTrace productsExplore solutionStablecoin Issuers
Frame an issuer evaluation around the activity you want to understand, the context you need, and the limits of the available evidence.
Primary review question“Which token activity patterns require issuer-level attention?”
Illustrative workflow examples- Circulation activity review
- Reserve-related context
- Evidence limits
Related FinTrace productsExplore solutionFintech and Web3 Companies
Explore how blockchain intelligence might fit your product, starting with a defined user need and an integration contract to verify.
Primary review question“What integration contract would bring risk context into our product?”
Illustrative workflow examples- Defined user need
- API integration
- Response handling
Related FinTrace productsExplore solutionGovernment and Regulators
Define the public-sector question, evidence context, and review boundaries for a focused blockchain intelligence evaluation.
Primary review question“What evidence and review boundaries define this public-sector question?”
Illustrative workflow examples- Oversight questions
- Evidence context
- Review boundaries
Related FinTrace productsExplore solutionLaw Enforcement
Start an investigation-tool evaluation with a defined question, authorized scope, and a clear account of what the evidence needs to explain.
Primary review question“What does the evidence need to explain, and within what authorized scope?”
Illustrative workflow examples- Investigation graph review
- Case evidence handling
- Authorized scope definition
Related FinTrace productsExplore solution
Question-based exploration
What does your team need to understand?
Start from the question in front of your team. Each one points to the product areas and audience pages that speak to it most directly.
Who is behind this address?
Where did these funds move?
Is there sanctions exposure?
Which activity requires review?
How should evidence be documented?
How can risk context enter our systems?
These connections describe how a question is typically framed for discussion. They are a starting point for your evaluation, not a guarantee of functionality.
Audience-to-product mapping
See how each audience typically maps to the platform
The same eight product topics support every audience differently. Use this map to see where a topic is usually the primary workflow, a supporting capability, or simply available to evaluate.
- Primary workflow
- Supporting capability
- Available for evaluation
| Audience | Wallet Screening | Transaction Monitoring | Blockchain Investigations | Entity Intelligence | Sanctions Screening | Case Management | Risk & Compliance API | Reports & Audit Trails |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto Exchanges and VASPs | ||||||||
| Banks and Financial Institutions | ||||||||
| Payment Providers | ||||||||
| Stablecoin Issuers | ||||||||
| Fintech and Web3 Companies | ||||||||
| Government and Regulators | ||||||||
| Law Enforcement |
These indicators describe how a topic is typically framed for that audience in a first conversation. They are illustrative categorizations, not confirmed functionality or guaranteed availability.
A shared institutional workflow
From a question to a documented decision.
Whatever the audience, the underlying path tends to look similar: an activity or question is checked, examined further where needed, reviewed by a person, tracked as a case, decided, and recorded.
- 1
Activity or question
A wallet, a transaction, or a review question comes in.
- 2
Screening or monitoring
The activity is checked against configured signals.
- 3
Investigation
Fund flows and connections are traced where needed.
- 4
Human review
A named reviewer reads the evidence and its limits.
- 5
Case management
The review is owned, tracked, and handed over as needed.
- 6
Documented decision
A person records the conclusion and its rationale.
- 7
Report and audit trail
Findings, evidence, and history are kept together.
Illustrative pipeline and sample interfaces. Your team’s actual stages are agreed during evaluation.
Bring it to the platform
Connect your requirements to the platform discussion
The Platform Overview introduces the eight product topics. Use it alongside the solution pages to distinguish the information your team needs from the capabilities that still require verification.
- Each audience page turns a broad category into specific review questions.
- Illustrative workflows show where a product topic might fit your process.
- Bring those questions into the Platform Overview to see how the topics connect.
How the platform is meant to work
Built around evidence, review, and traceability
Evidence-first analysis
Findings are meant to pair with sourced evidence, not stand alone as a score.
Human review
A reviewer records the decision. The platform is built to support that review, not replace it.
Explainable context
Confidence indicators and source references are designed to travel with a result.
Role-based workflows
Assignments and permissions are intended to keep ownership of a review clear.
Traceable decision records
Reports are designed to pair findings with a timestamped activity history.
Flexible deployment discussion
Cloud, on-premises, and air-gapped options are part of the conversation.
Start a conversation
Bring your workflow into the conversation
Tell us which audience, questions, and workflows matter most to your evaluation.