Questions worth exploring
Start with the activity. Then define the response.
A transaction-monitoring evaluation needs more than a list of desired notifications. Consider the activity you want to review, the reason a reviewer would take notice, and the action that should follow. FinTrace Core monitors activity in real time against configurable risk thresholds, with FinTrace Radar adding signals for emerging threats and sanctions-related patterns.
- 1
Monitor activity
Watch the transactions and addresses in scope.
- 2
Detect risk signals
Compare activity with your thresholds and rules.
- 3
Generate an alert
Raise a prioritised alert with its context.
- 4
Assign a reviewer
Route the alert to the person responsible.
- 5
Investigate evidence
Examine counterparties, exposure and history.
- 6
Record the decision
Document the outcome and keep the audit record.
Live monitoring demonstration
Watch activity become a documented response.
Follow a transaction from the live feed to a flagged alert, an assigned reviewer and an escalated case, with filters, rules and history one click away.
| Time | Wallet · entity | Amount · network | Rule triggered | Score change | Level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14:32:02 | 0x8d2c…7e1fSanctioned entity | 48.20 ETHEthereum | Sanctioned counterparty | 54→81 | Critical | Escalated |
| 14:31:48 | bc1q9x…k7m2Mixer (example) | 3.85 BTCBitcoin | Mixer exposure > 10% | 41→72 | High | In review |
| 14:31:20 | 0x41a7…9ad2DeFi protocol (example) | 12.40 ETHArbitrum | Rapid movement of funds | 33→58 | Medium | Assigned |
| 14:30:57 | 0x7c3e…e0b1Exchange (example) | 210,000 USDCPolygon | Amount threshold | 18→44 | Medium | Open |
| 14:30:31 | TQn9…Zk3pNew counterparty | 9,400 USDTTron | New counterparty | 12→21 | Low | Open |
| 14:30:12 | 0xa93f…c04bKnown exchange | 2.10 ETHEthereum | None | 9→9 | No alert | Cleared |
| 14:29:44 | bc1p4z…q2vdPrivate wallet | 0.42 BTCBitcoin | None | 14→14 | No alert | Cleared |
- All 68Critical 2High 7Medium 18Low 41
- Sanctioned counterparty, 2 hopsAL-88213 · 2 min agoCritical
- Mixer exposure > 10%AL-88207 · 3 min agoHigh
- Rapid movement of fundsAL-88199 · 4 min agoMedium
- Amount threshold exceededAL-88190 · 5 min agoMedium
- New counterpartyAL-88184 · 6 min agoLow
- Counterparty attributed to a sanctioned entity within two hops
- Transfer follows a mixer interaction on the same day
- Source: watchlist reference · confidence Medium
| Rule | Condition | Severity | State | Last triggered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction amount threshold | Amount ≥ 50 ETH equivalent | Medium | Active | 2 min ago |
| Risk-score threshold | Score ≥ 75 | High | Active | 3 min ago |
| Sanctions exposure | Direct or indirect, ≤ 2 hops | Critical | Active | 2 min ago |
| High-risk jurisdiction | Counterparty in custom list | High | Draft | Not yet live |
| Rapid movement of funds | ≥ 80% moved within 30 min | Medium | Draft | Not yet live |
| Unusual transaction frequency | ≥ 20 transfers in 10 min | Medium | Active | 4 min ago |
| New counterparty | First interaction above 5 ETH | Low | Disabled | Disabled |
Open 3
- AL-88190Medium
Amount threshold exceeded
JM5 min - AL-88184Low
New counterparty, Tron
JM6 min - AL-88176Medium
Unusual transaction frequency
SK11 min
In review 2
- AL-88207High
Mixer exposure > 10%
AR3 min - AL-88199Medium
Rapid movement of funds
SK4 min
Escalated 2
- AL-88213Critical
Sanctioned counterparty, 2 hops
AR9 min - AL-88161High
Sanctions exposure, indirect
LB24 min
- Today 14:41Alert AL-88213 escalated, case CS-2041 opened
- Today 14:33AL-88213 assigned to A. Rahman
- Yesterday 17:20Rule “Rapid movement of funds” saved as draft
- Oct 22 09:05Threshold reviewed: risk score ≥ 75
- Oct 18 16:48Alert AL-87911 closed with documented decision
Illustrative interface, sample data. Monitoring is not performed on this website.
Rules and alert configuration
Configure what deserves attention.
These controls illustrate the kinds of conditions a team might set. They are evaluation examples; which conditions, thresholds and states are available is confirmed with the team during your evaluation.
- Transaction amount thresholdFlag transfers above a set value.Active
- Risk-score thresholdAlert when a score crosses your level.Active
- Sanctions exposureDirect or indirect links to sanctions sources.Active
- High-risk jurisdictionCounterparties in jurisdictions you list.Draft
- Rapid movement of fundsFunds moved on quickly after receipt.Draft
- Unusual transaction frequencyA burst of transfers in a short window.Active
- New counterpartyFirst interaction with an address.Disabled
- Direct or indirect exposureExposure categories at one hop and beyond.Active
Evaluation examples with Active, Draft and Disabled states. Not a list of confirmed rules.
Response management
Clear responsibility from alert to audit record.
Decide what is in scope, what deserves attention and who owns each response before you switch anything on.
- 01
Activity in scope
Outline the transactions, addresses, and business processes you would like to discuss. Identify the networks and time periods relevant to the evaluation.
- 02
Review priorities
Describe the situations that should receive attention and the context a reviewer would need. Discuss how your team would distinguish a useful notification from an unresolved question.
- 03
Response ownership
Identify who would receive an item for review, who could make a decision, and what information should accompany a handover.
Monitoring system
Detects activity against your rules and raises the alert.
AutomatedAlertCompliance analyst
Reviews the evidence and decides to clear, investigate or escalate.
Human reviewEscalateSenior reviewer
Takes escalated alerts and decides the response.
Human reviewCase openedCase management
Holds the case, its owner and the full activity history.
System of recordDecision loggedAudit record
Keeps the evidence, decision and timestamps for later review.
Retained
Automation surfaces the alert. People make the decision and own the outcome.
Prepare a focused conversation
Bring a scenario. Define what you want to learn.
Bring a fictional example of an activity change and explain why it would matter to your team. We’ll walk through how risk thresholds, rules, and alert delivery would apply to your scenario.
- 1Describe the activity
- 2Define review priorities
- 3Plan the response
A simple way to structure your evaluation call.
Describe monitored activity
Select risk signals
Define alert thresholds
Choose reviewers
Define escalation steps
- 1Analyst reviews and clears or escalates
- 2Senior reviewer decides the response
- 3Compliance officer signs off
Confirm required evidence
Performance and alert insights
See where alerts come from and how they are resolved.
Operational insights help a team tune its rules, balance reviewer workload and demonstrate control. The figures below are illustrative demo data.
Alerts by severity
- Critical4%
- High16%
- Medium38%
- Low42%
Alerts over time
Last 14 daysAverage review time
18 minFrom alert to first decisionEscalated cases
7Of 68 alerts this weekMost-triggered rules
- Risk-score threshold19
- Sanctions exposure14
- Amount threshold12
- Unusual transaction frequency9
- Rapid movement of funds7
Review status
- Open34%
- In review28%
- Escalated9%
- Closed29%
Open alerts by reviewer
- A. Rahman14
- S. Kim11
- J. Meyer9
- L. Brandt7
Monitored networks
In this demo data set- ΞEthereum38%
- ₿Bitcoin27%
- PPolygon14%
- AArbitrum11%
- TTron10%
All figures are illustrative demo data, not customer or product results.
Product verification
What needs confirmation
Transaction Monitoring runs configurable risk thresholds against real-time and historical activity, with rule-based alerting delivered through your existing case-management or notification channels. Use these questions to confirm the details that matter for your deployment.
- Ask · 01
Real-time versus scheduled monitoring
Which activity is monitored in real time, and what update cadence applies to your deployment?
- Ask · 02
Supported networks and assets
Which networks and assets can be monitored for your use case?
- Ask · 03
Historical data availability
How far back can historical activity be reviewed against your rules?
- Ask · 04
Rule configuration
Which conditions can your team configure, and who can change them?
- Ask · 05
Alert delivery channels
How are alerts delivered: case management, email or other notification channels?
- Ask · 06
User roles and permissions
How are analysts, senior reviewers and administrators separated?
- Ask · 07
Case-management integration
How do alerts hand over to your existing case-management process?
- Ask · 08
Evidence retention
What evidence is kept with each alert, and for how long?
- Ask · 09
API and webhook availability
Which API endpoints or webhooks are available for alerts?
These are evaluation questions, not confirmed claims. Answers depend on your deployment and are agreed with the team during your evaluation.
Before your demo
Transaction Monitoring: questions and answers
Is real-time monitoring confirmed?
Yes. FinTrace Core monitors activity in real time against configurable risk thresholds. Ask for the current update cadence for your deployment.
Can my team configure rules and alerts?
Yes. Risk thresholds and alert delivery channels are configurable per team. Describe the conditions and delivery channels you need in a demo request.
How does this relate to wallet screening?
Wallet Screening evaluates a single address on demand; Transaction Monitoring watches ongoing activity and raises signals automatically. The two work together in a typical workflow.
Start a conversation
Plan a transaction-monitoring discussion
Describe the activity you care about and how your team would respond to it.
