Questions worth exploring
An address is a starting point. Define what comes next.
What is your team trying to understand before proceeding with a wallet review? FinTrace Core evaluates wallet risk in real time, with entity resolution and address clustering to add counterparty context. Bring the relevant network, the reason for the review, and the information needed by the person making the decision.
- 01The review context
Enter and identify the wallet
Describe whether the review relates to onboarding, a proposed transfer, or an existing relationship. Specify what information your reviewer already has and what remains uncertain.
Address · network · context - 02Evidence you want to examine
Examine evidence and exposure
Ask what sources could support an assessment, how they would be dated, and how uncertain or incomplete information would be communicated.
Score · exposure · sources - 03The next decision
Decide and document the next action
Set out who will review the findings and what additional information they may need. Discuss how the outcome would fit your own internal process.
Decision · rationale · record
Product demonstration
See how a wallet screening comes together.
Enter an address and network, then move through the score, the exposure, the connected wallets and the evidence behind them, ending in a report your reviewers can keep.
- Indirect sanctions link
- Mixer interaction
- Rapid onward transfer
- Exchange deposit cluster
- Long-lived address
- Indirect sanctions link2 hops · via mixerHigh
- Mixer interaction4 transactionsMedium
- New counterparty clusterLast 30 daysLow
- Connected entities
- EXExchange (example)Direct · 41%High
- MXMixer (example)Direct · 9%Medium
- SESanctioned entityIndirect · 2 hopsMedium
| Source | Signal | Confidence | Timestamp (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public disclosure | Exchange deposit cluster | High | 2024-10-24 14:31:08 |
| Address clustering | Cluster of 214 addresses | High | 2024-10-24 14:31:09 |
| Blockchain analysis | Mixer interaction, 4 transactions | Medium | 2024-10-24 14:31:11 |
| Watchlist reference | Indirect sanctions link, 2 hops | Medium | 2024-10-24 14:32:02 |
| Behavioural heuristic | Rapid onward transfer | Low | 2024-10-24 14:32:04 |
Screening history 3 earlier screenings of this address are preserved with their evidence and timestamps.
Illustrative interface, sample data. Screening is not performed on this website.
Prepare a focused conversation
Bring a scenario. Define what you want to learn.
For a demo discussion, describe an address-review scenario using fictional or approved sample information — not a real wallet. We’ll walk through the risk score, entity context, and evidence checklist for your scenario.
- 1Define the address-review question
- 2Discuss evidence and coverage
- 3Agree the next review step
A simple way to structure your evaluation call.
- Checklist 1 of 4
The question being investigated
What is the review about: onboarding, a proposed transfer, or an existing relationship? What does your reviewer already know?
- Checklist 2 of 4
Evidence and networks required
Which network and address formats are involved, and which sources should support the assessment and how should they be dated?
- Checklist 3 of 4
Relevant risk thresholds
Which score levels or exposure categories should lead to review, further investigation or escalation under your policy?
- Checklist 4 of 4
The intended review decision
Who makes the decision, what do they need to see, and how is the outcome and rationale recorded?
Product verification
What needs confirmation
Wallet Screening is built for addresses on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and additional Layer-1 and Layer-2 networks, and returns a risk score with entity context, source references, and confidence indicators. Confirm network coverage for your use case during evaluation.
Networks
- ₿BitcoinAddress review across the Bitcoin network.In scope for discussion
- ΞEthereumAddress review across the Ethereum network.In scope for discussion
- L1Supported Layer 1 networksAdditional Layer-1 networks and their address formats.Confirm during evaluation
- L2Supported Layer 2 networksAdditional Layer-2 networks and their address formats.Confirm during evaluation
Screening output
- Direct exposureRisk from counterparties one hop from the address.
- Indirect exposureRisk from counterparties further along the flow of funds.
- Risk attributionEach finding tied to a source and an attributed entity.
- Confidence indicatorsA confidence level shown for every attribution.
- Screening timestampThe time of screening recorded with the evidence.
Network availability, address formats and coverage depth vary. Confirm the current coverage for the networks you need as part of your evaluation.
Key capabilities
Everything a wallet review needs, in one screening.
Eight capabilities work together so a reviewer can go from an address to a documented decision without leaving the evidence behind.
- 01
Address risk scoring
A real-time score for any address, with the signals behind it.
- 02
Sanctions exposure
Direct and indirect links to sanctions and watchlist sources.
- 03
Entity attribution
Sourced entities, each with a confidence indicator.
- 04
Direct and indirect exposure
Risk categories at one hop and further along the flow.
- 05
Transaction tracing
Follow funds to and from the address.
- 06
Evidence preservation
Sources and timestamps kept with every screening.
- 07
Screening history
Review earlier screenings of the same address.
- 08
Audit-ready reports
Export findings, evidence and timestamps for review.
Decision output
Built to support human review.
Wallet Screening returns a risk score and supporting context; your team decides how that feeds into an approval or escalation.
- 01Clear for review
Score and evidence sit within your thresholds. A reviewer confirms and proceeds.
Human reviewer - 02Additional investigation required
Evidence is incomplete or conflicting. Trace further and gather more context.
Human reviewer - 03Escalate to compliance
Exposure crosses a threshold. Compliance reviews the evidence pack.
Human reviewer - 04Document final decision
The reviewer records the outcome, the rationale and the evidence timestamp.
Human reviewer
Evidence and context, not automatic conclusions.
A risk score summarises evidence and context so your team can decide. It is not an automatic compliance decision or a legal conclusion. Thresholds, escalation and outcomes follow your own policy and your reviewers’ judgement.
Illustrative workflow, sample data.
Before your demo
Wallet Screening: questions and answers
Can I screen a wallet on this website?
No. This marketing website does not submit wallet addresses or calculate risk. The homepage review is an explicitly illustrative example.
Does a screening result provide an automatic decision?
Wallet Screening returns a risk score and supporting context; your team decides how that feeds into an approval or escalation. Ask about configuring decision thresholds for your workflow.
Which networks can I discuss?
Bitcoin and Ethereum, plus additional Layer-1 and Layer-2 networks. Ask for the current address-format and coverage matrix for your use case, and confirm the networks you need during evaluation.
Start a conversation
Discuss your wallet-screening requirements
Bring your address-review questions and the evidence your team needs to evaluate.