Solutions / Digital-asset services

Crypto Exchanges and VASPs

Frame your exchange or VASP evaluation around address review, transaction oversight, and the handover from an alert to a decision.

Discuss Your Requirements All Solutions

Capabilities require confirmation. Workflows are illustrative and benefits are goals to validate, not proven FinTrace Intelligence outcomes.

For exchanges and VASPs

Challenges to address

For an exchange or virtual asset service provider, a useful starting point is the point at which blockchain information would enter an existing review. Is the question about a proposed transfer, an address associated with a customer, or activity that needs further examination? Define that context before evaluating a tool. These discussion topics do not confirm any current FinTrace Intelligence feature or customer relationship.

  • Context around an address

    A reviewer may need more than an address string to understand why an item needs attention. Define which customer or transfer context belongs with the review and which information should remain outside it.

    • Incoming deposit requires review

  • Priorities across activity

    If several types of activity could prompt review, clarify what takes priority and who decides. Describe the difference between an item that needs more context and one ready for escalation.

    • Withdrawal triggers a risk signal
    • Activity needs escalation

  • Handover between teams

    Operations and specialist reviewers may ask different questions. Identify the evidence and reasoning that need to travel with an item so the next person can continue the review.

    • Operations hands a review to compliance

These are illustrative scenarios to frame a discussion. They do not describe an automated capability.

Deposit and withdrawal review

An illustrative exchange review workspace

A deposit or a withdrawal carries its wallet, its customer reference, its risk indicators and its exposure together, so a reviewer can decide the next step without hunting for context.

Exchange Intelligence · Review workspaceIllustrative
Deposit

Incoming transfer under review

Additional evidence required
Wallet address
0x3be0a1c4…5d17
Customer reference
CUST-88213 (example)
Asset and network
ETH · Ethereum
Amount
12.4 ETH
Risk indicators
Medium Rapid movement (example)
Exposure
Direct 0.0% · Indirect 4.2%
Transaction history
  • Screening completedOct 21 · 10:12
  • Flagged by monitoring ruleOct 21 · 10:14
  • Assigned to compliance analystOct 22 · 09:20
  • Additional evidence requestedOct 23 · 11:40
Reviewer notes

Deposit pattern is consistent with a service address that has many customers. Requested the customer’s source-of-funds statement before deciding.

Current stateAdditional evidence required

A person decides the next step. This state is not an automated approval or block.

Other possible states
Awaiting reviewEscalatedReviewedDecision documented
Suggested next review stepRequest the source-of-funds statement, then route to a senior reviewer for a decision.

Illustrative demo data with a fictional customer and wallet. No live data is shown or stored on this website.

Product topics

Relevant capabilities to evaluate

These product topics are relevant to the discussion. Follow each link for evaluation questions and the scope still requiring verification; a link does not confirm an available integration.

  1. Wallet or transaction activity
  2. Risk context
  3. Reviewer alert
  4. Managed case
  5. Documented decision

A demo outline

An illustrative review workflow

Use this outline to explain your process during a demo. It describes human evaluation steps, not confirmed software automation.

  1. 1

    Identify activity requiring review

    A deposit, withdrawal, or address is flagged for a first look.

  2. 2

    Examine wallet and transaction context

    The wallet, its counterparties, and its history are gathered.

  3. 3

    Review risk indicators and evidence

    Risk score, exposure, and source references are read together.

  4. 4

    Assign the appropriate reviewer

    The item is routed to the person best placed to continue it.

  5. 5

    Decide the next action

    A person decides to clear, request evidence, or escalate.

  6. 6

    Record reasoning and preserve history

    The rationale and the record are kept for later review.

Illustrative six-step sequence and sample interfaces.

  • Keep in view · 01

    Frame a transfer-review scenario

    Use fictional or approved sample material to describe the address, activity, and reason for review. Identify the question a reviewer must answer.

  • Keep in view · 02

    Review the available evidence

    Ask which product behavior can be demonstrated and how the output represents sources, uncertainty, and coverage limits.

  • Keep in view · 03

    Define the next action

    Describe how your team would review the finding, assign follow-up, and record its reasoning within your existing process.

Ownership and handovers

Teams and handovers

Work may pass between customer operations, transaction operations, a compliance analyst, a senior reviewer, and a case manager. Each handover is shown with its owner, a timestamp, the context that travelled with it, and the evidence attached.

CO

Customer operations

Receives the deposit or withdrawal request and confirms the customer reference.

Awaiting review
  • Context: request details
  • Evidence: none yet
TO

Transaction operations

Confirms the transaction on-chain and links the wallet to the request.

Awaiting review
  • Context: wallet and network
  • Evidence: screening report
CA

Compliance analyst

Reads the risk indicators and requests the source-of-funds statement.

Additional evidence required
  • Context: risk indicators
  • Evidence: 2 items, 1 requested
SR

Senior reviewer

Weighs the evidence against the exposure and escalates for a decision.

Escalated
  • Context: full case history
  • Evidence: 4 items
CM

Case manager

Records the final decision and closes the case with its rationale.

Decision documented
  • Context: decision and rationale
  • Evidence: complete record

The exact roles, permissions, and handover steps shown here are illustrative. Confirm which ones apply to your organization during evaluation.

Illustrative demo data with a fictional case.

Operational insights

A view of the review queue

An operational view helps a team see where attention is needed: what is waiting, what is escalated, and which signals recur most often.

Exchange Intelligence · Operational viewIllustrative demo data
Activity awaiting review37
Escalated items6
Review aging1.8 days
Cases closed this week52
Alerts by severity
  • Low severity
    62
  • Medium severity
    34
  • High severity
    12
Deposit versus withdrawal reviews
  • Deposits reviewed
    44
  • Withdrawals reviewed
    28
Most common risk signals
  • Rapid movement (example)21 itemsSample
  • New counterparty (example)14 itemsSample
  • Indirect sanctions path (example)6 itemsSample
  • Structuring pattern (example)9 itemsSample

Illustrative demo data. These values are examples, not a live queue or measured product output.

Evaluation objectives

Potential benefits to validate

These are intended outcomes for your evaluation, not measured product results. Compare any available demonstration with your own requirements before drawing a conclusion.

More consistent review context

A target to validate is a clearer set of information accompanying each review. Compare a demonstrated output with your own review brief.

Question to validateDoes the demonstrated output match the information your reviewers currently have to assemble by hand?

More useful handovers

Assess whether another reviewer could understand the question, evidence, and unresolved points without reconstructing the discussion.

Question to validateCould a second reviewer pick up the case from the record alone, without asking the first reviewer to explain it?

A better-defined evaluation

Agree which use cases and limits need verification before discussing adoption. This is an evaluation goal, not a measured product outcome.

Question to validateWhich use cases and limits still need a demonstrated answer before your team can decide?

Product verification

Scope and evidence still needed

[Placeholder: verified exchange/VASP use cases, address and network coverage, monitoring cadence, review tools, integration options, and operating limits.]

  • Ask · 01

    Supported networks and assets

    Which networks and assets can be screened for your exchange?

  • Ask · 02

    Exchange-specific workflows

    Which review workflows exist for deposits, withdrawals, and onboarding?

  • Ask · 03

    Address and transaction coverage

    How complete is coverage for the addresses and transactions you handle?

  • Ask · 04

    Monitoring cadence

    How often is activity checked, and how are updates communicated?

  • Ask · 05

    Review and escalation controls

    How are review states set, and who can escalate an item?

  • Ask · 06

    Existing-system integration

    How would a review connect to your current systems?

  • Ask · 07

    Case-management requirements

    What does your team need from case ownership and handover?

  • Ask · 08

    Evidence retention

    How long is evidence kept, and can that be configured?

  • Ask · 09

    Deployment requirements

    Which deployment options fit your operating environment?

  • Ask · 10

    Operating limits

    What are the known limits of coverage, and how are they communicated?

These are questions for a demo and technical evaluation, not confirmed capabilities.

Before your demo

Questions from Crypto Exchanges and VASPs

Can this automate deposit or withdrawal decisions?

Automated decisions or transfer controls are not confirmed. Explain the decision points your team needs and ask what, if anything, the available product can support.

Does FinTrace Intelligence support our networks?

[Placeholder: approved network, asset, and transaction coverage.] Bring your network requirements to the demo; this page does not imply support.

Can we connect a review to our existing systems?

Integration endpoints, case-system connections, and access arrangements require verification. The Risk & Compliance API product page provides questions for that discussion.

Start a conversation

Discuss your exchange or VASP workflow

Tell us how a deposit, a withdrawal, or an address moves through your review today.

Request Demo
All Solutions